You face a familiar situation in economics education. Students read charts, dashboards, and models. Many reproduce labels and formulas. Fewer explain relationships, assumptions, and consequences. Interactive images with Gemini address this gap by keeping attention on visual reasoning while supporting guided inquiry.

This workshop starts from a simple premise. Learning in economics often happens around visual artifacts. Think of a supply and demand graph under multiple shocks, a balance sheet across reporting periods, or a risk return frontier for portfolio choice. Students struggle not because visuals look complex, but because instruction often jumps too quickly to answers.

The session opens by grounding the approach in everyday teaching practice. Instructors examine examples from economics, finance, management, and marketing. A macroeconomic dashboard becomes a shared object of inquiry. A cost structure diagram highlights trade offs. A customer journey map exposes decision points. Each image anchors discussion before any explanation appears.

Participants will explore the process of making an image interactive. The image stays central. Clickable regions invite focused questions. Gemini responds only within the boundaries set by the instructor. You decide where students look and what they ask. The tool supports interpretation rather than replacing thinking.

The workshop then models a full teaching workflow. An instructor uploads a break even analysis chart. Prompts guide students to examine variable costs, fixed costs, and operating leverage. Students test scenarios, explain outcomes, and justify claims. The interaction stays tied to the image, not to generic text generation.

Hands on design follows. Instructors bring their own course concepts. Some work with fiscal policy transmission diagrams. Others choose organizational charts or financial timelines. Each participant defines a learning objective, writes targeted prompts, and designs a follow up question that asks for justification. The focus stays on cognitive demand and instructional intent.

The final part of the session shifts to integration. Participants discuss where interactive images fit best. Some choose pre class exploration. Others plan in class group work anchored on different image regions. Several identify exam preparation as a strong use case when prompts require explanation rather than recall.

Students benefit from this approach because learning stays visible. You see their reasoning. You see where misconceptions appear. Students practice interpretation, comparison, and explanation using the same visuals they face in professional contexts.

Instructors benefit because the design stays lightweight. You reuse images you already teach with. You control prompts and boundaries. You gain insight into student thinking without adding grading complexity.

If you have interest in partcipating in such a workshop, share your interest. A tailored session can align examples with your disciplinary focus and teaching goals.

Stay in contact with the Science and Research Institute for more info: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7413876650762969088

05 яну 2026